DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
mre
Docket No: 7004-14
8 May 2015
This 1s in reference to your App
i,
+
lication for Correction of
n which you requested the record
Military Records, DD Form 149,
be corrected to reflect a “general under honorable conditions”
characterization of service on your Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214). [In this regard, you
may wish to contact Headquarters, United States Marine Corps
Separation and Retirement Branch (MMSR), 3280 Russell Road, ,
Quantico, VA 22134-5103, to quest administrative changes, such
re
as yours, to your naval record.
Ae a + Le fF +) r 5 7 , 7 1 j
AS a result of the foregoing, no accion is required by this Board
and your case is hereby administratively closed.
Dm - SNrwo3re:
nh Ww. a Noo Lu
We tare Ta rere ae
eo WS ib Lrecrco
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3584 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,- your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization: of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3530 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction ‘of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2014. ; ‘Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your ‘application; together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3705 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted cf your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ble material error or injustice. year from the date of the Board's decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4417 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the psychological evaluation, your Commanding officer did not © recommend you for retention and recommended’ you for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to personality Gisorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 13097 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the’...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR273 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, You reenlisted in the Navy on 1 January 1989. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6745 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08393 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2012. As you have not demonstrated that you were entitled to a disability rating of 30% or higher from the Department of the Navy as of 24 February 1993, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...